John B. Roberts, Jr., and Jean Roberts - Page 5

                                        - 4 -                                         
          apply to the 1988 deficiency; therefore, the sole issue for                 
          decision is whether the collection by respondent of the second              
          mortgage should have been applied to petitioners’ 1988 tax                  
          liability.                                                                  
               On February 27, 2001, respondent notified petitioners of an            
          intent to levy with respect to petitioners’ unpaid tax                      
          liabilities for 1988, 1992, 1993, and 1997.  The notice listed              
          the following amounts due:                                                  

                    Year                      Amount                                  
                    1988                     $6,824.33                                
                    1992                     548.28                                   
                    1993                     2,701.54                                 
                    1997                     2,178.67                                 

               Petitioners filed a timely Form 12153, Request for a                   
          Collection Due Process Hearing.  In their request, petitioners              
          stated their belief that the tax liabilities for the subject                
          years had been overpaid and “over the past nine years concerning            
          these matters” they had “never had a hearing concerning moneys              
          paid [the IRS] in excess of what I owed.”  Petitioners thereafter           
          received a letter from an Appeals officer that included                     
          transcripts of petitioners’ accounts showing assessments and                
          payments made.  Petitioners were also asked to provide                      
          documentation, such as canceled checks, to show payments not                
          applied to their accounts.  Petitioners were also asked to                  
          provide financial information regarding possible collection                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011