John B. Roberts, Jr., and Jean Roberts - Page 7

                                        - 6 -                                         
          of discretion by respondent is defined as any action that is                
          unreasonable, arbitrary or capricious, clearly unlawful, or                 
          lacking sound basis in law, taking into account all the facts and           
          circumstances.  See, e.g., Thor Power Tool Co. v. Commissioner,             
          439 U.S. 522, 532-533 (1979); Swanson v. Commissioner, 121 T.C.             
          111, 119 (2003).                                                            
               During the telephone conference call with the Appeals                  
          officer, petitioner husband did not dispute the underlying                  
          deficiency but raised the misapplied payment issue.  On January             
          5, 1990, shortly after receipt of Form 668, Notice of Federal Tax           
          Lien, petitioners had filed for bankruptcy.  Petitioner husband             
          testified he and his wife filed for bankruptcy on the advice of             
          Revenue Agent Robert Spivey, whom they had been meeting in                  
          connection with their liabilities.  In their bankruptcy petition,           
          petitioners included the IRS as a creditor.  As previously                  
          stated, petitioners owed the IRS a total of $14,533 arising from            
          tax deficiencies for the taxable years 1972, 1977, 1978, 1985,              
          and 1986, but the IRS could collect only on the deficiencies from           
          1985 and 1986.                                                              
               As noted earlier, in their bankruptcy proceeding,                      
          petitioners listed a second mortgage held by them that had been             
          “attached” by the IRS.  The mortgage had a value of $15,000, and,           
          upon the advice of Mr. Spivey, petitioners assigned the mortgage            
          to the IRS for collection.  At one of their meetings, petitioner            
          husband testified Mr. Spivey assisted him in preparing his tax              




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011