- 14 -
Runkle filed a petition with the Federal District Court for the
Northern District of Texas (Texas Federal District Court) to
quash the insurance company summonses. A magistrate judge for
the Texas Federal District Court issued findings and
recommendations denying Mr. Runkle’s petition to quash the
insurance company summonses. The magistrate judge for the Texas
Federal District Court found that Mr. Runkle’s arguments to quash
the insurance company summonses were “not supported by the
statute or case law.”
Special Agent Fabina also caused a summons to be served on
Rodman & Renshaw, Inc. on March 8, 1996, regarding income
information and distributions made to Mr. Runkle for 1991 through
and including 1995 (the Rodman summons). Mr. Runkle filed a
petition with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District
of Illinois (Illinois Federal District Court) to quash the Rodman
summons on April 3, 1996. Special Agent Fabina served a second
summons on Rodman & Renshaw, Inc. on April 28, 1997 (second
Rodman summons). Mr. Runkle filed a petition with the Illinois
Federal District Court to quash the second Rodman summons on May
13, 1997. The Illinois Federal District Court rejected Mr.
Runkle’s efforts to quash the Rodman summons and the second
Rodman summons. Thereafter, Rodman produced the requested
documents to respondent.
Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011