-255- duplicating tax benefits. Respondent contends that Imperial never intended to enter into a film finance business through Corona. Petitioner contends that SMP and Imperial entered into the Corona transaction with the bona fide business purpose of film financing. For the reasons discussed in more detail above, we conclude that SMP had no basis in the $79 million receivable when it contributed that receivable to Corona for a membership interest. Consequently, SMP’s adjusted basis in its membership interest was limited to its $250,000 cash contribution to Corona. Also, since SMP had no basis in the $79 million receivable on its contribution, Corona did not obtain any basis in that receivable under section 723 when the receivable was contributed. Because SMP did not receive a substituted basis in its membership interest equal to the purported basis that it claimed in the $79 million receivable and because Corona did not receive any carryover basis in the $79 million receivable, SMP is not entitled to the substantial losses that it claimed from the sales of its Corona membership interests to Imperial, and Corona is not entitled to the substantial loss that it claimed from the sale of the $79 million receivable to TroMetro. This analysis effectively disposes of the issues relating to the Corona transaction; however, for sake of completeness, we shall brieflyPage: Previous 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011