Santa Monica Pictures, LLC, Perry Lerner, Tax Matters Partner - Page 221

                                        -291-                                         
          provide no analysis of the partnership basis rules (specifically            
          section 704(c)) but instead focus on the recognition or                     
          nonrecognition of gain or loss under section 351, the                       
          consolidated loss disallowance and separate return limitation               
          year rules under section 1502, the built-in loss limitations of             
          section 382, the section 384(a) pre-acquisition loss rules, and             
          the section 269(a)(2) disallowance rules for tax-motivated                  
          corporate acquisitions.  The memoranda propound a series of                 
          hypothetical transactions, none of which appear to have actually            
          occurred, and do not rely on, or analyze, the relevant facts of             
          the CDR transaction.205  Consequently, we cannot agree that these           
          memoranda establish reasonable cause.                                       


               204(...continued)                                                      
               In the second memorandum dated Aug. 30, 1996, Shearman &               
          Sterling also analyzed two alternative transactions.  In the                
          first alternative, the “Section 351 Transaction”, Acquirer, a               
          U.S. corporation (“GCo”), transfers property to a new or existing           
          subsidiary (“DCo”) in exchange for stock of DCo, and,                       
          concurrently, CDR transfers all the stock of MGM Holdings to DCo            
          in exchange for cash and stock of DCo.  Immediately after these             
          transfers, GCo owns at least 80 percent of the vote and value of            
          DCo.  In the second alternative, the “B Reorganization”, GCo                
          acquires all the stock of MGM Holdings from CDR in exchange for             
          GCo’s publicly traded voting common stock or voting preferred               
          stock redeemable in 5 years.                                                
               205 The memoranda were prepared before the closing date of             
          the New MGM transaction and MGM Holdings’s dissolution.  Although           
          the memoranda acknowledge the New MGM sale and the existence of             
          tax attributes in MGM Holdings, the memoranda are framed in terms           
          of CDR’s “expected” basis in MGM Holdings’s stock following the             
          sale.  The memoranda do not analyze these expectations or provide           
          any insight regarding CDR’s basis in MGM Group Holdings or the              
          effect of a dissolution of MGM Holdings.                                    





Page:  Previous  281  282  283  284  285  286  287  288  289  290  291  292  293  294  295  296  297  298  299  300  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011