Santa Monica Pictures, LLC, Perry Lerner, Tax Matters Partner - Page 227

                                        -297-                                         
               The memorandum also provides some discussion of the                    
          transaction with CDR, describing it as follows:                             
               The Rockport Members interest in * * * [SMHC] did not                  
               originate with a desire to obtain a favorable tax                      
               attribute that could be used as a tax shelter.  Rather,                
               their interest originated in a desire to acquire all                   
               the assets of MGM and, when it became clear that they                  
               would not be able to acquire all such assets, to                       
               acquire certain valuable assets that remained.  * * *                  
                    The Rockport Members then decided to acquire an                   
               interest in * * * [SMHC].  GB and CLIS wanted to retain                
               some interest in * * * [SMHC].  In this context, the                   
               Rockport Members, GB and CLIS, each for their own valid                
               business reasons, became members of the Company in a                   
               way that made it possible to preserve a favorable tax                  
               attribute, namely the basis of the MGM Debt and the MGM                
               Stock.                                                                 
          On this basis, Shearman & Sterling concluded:                               
                    No transaction involving the Company should be                    
               recharacterized under substance over form principles.                  
               GB, CLIS and the Rockport Members became members by                    
               contributing property to the Company.  At the time GB                  
               and CLIS transferred the MGM Debt and the MGM Stock to                 
               the Company, they were under no obligation to transfer                 
               any portion of their interest in the Company to any                    
               person.  Thereafter, the Somerville S Trust purchased                  
               interests from GB and CLIS.  GB and CLIS should not be                 
               treated as selling the MGM Debt and the MGM Stock to                   
               the Rockport Members who then contributed such property                
               to the Company.  Although courts have been willing to                  
               step transactions together, they have generally been                   
               reluctant to reverse the order of steps.  [Discussing                  
               Esmark & Affiliated Cos. v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 171                  
               (1988).]                                                               
               Shearman & Sterling’s description of the CDR transaction and           
          its conclusion are based on faulty factual assumptions regarding            
          the Ackerman group’s purposes for entering into the transaction             
          with CDR, Generale Bank, and CLIS.  To wit, we have concluded               






Page:  Previous  287  288  289  290  291  292  293  294  295  296  297  298  299  300  301  302  303  304  305  306  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011