Laura D. Seidel - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
               Financial Services, which are secured by deeds of trust on             
               wife’s home.  After those two (2) debts are paid, any                  
               balance of the proceeds shall be split equally between the             
               parties.  Any proceeds remaining in Husband’s 401K plan                
               shall be confirmed to Husband as his sole and separate                 
               property.                                                              
               The Marital Settlement Agreement was reviewed by Lillick &             
          Charles, LLP, Attorneys at Law (Lillick & Charles), and by the              
          administrator of the CWSC 401(k) plan, for whom Lillick & Charles           
          acted as counsel.  Based upon this review, the plan administrator           
          refused to comply with the Marital Settlement Agreement because             
          it did not constitute a QDRO.  Due to Mr. Seidel’s continuing               
          employment, the plan administrator would not distribute the                 
          called for amount to Mr. Seidel.                                            
               Mr. Fruitman and Mr. Adams negotiated a second Marital                 
          Settlement Agreement which incorporated a Domestic Relations                
          Order (DRO).  They submitted the proposed QDRO with their                   
          respective party’s approval to Lillick & Charles on May 28, 1999.           
          The Marital Settlement Agreement did not provide for the payment            
          of funds from petitioner to Mr. Seidel for use in making the                
          mortgage interest payment at issue in the present case.                     
          Petitioner expressly waived all spousal support in the Marital              
          Settlement Agreement.                                                       
               Lillick & Charles advised Mr. Fruitman and Mr. Adams on June           
          7, 1999, that the proposed DRO was satisfactory, met the                    
          requirements of a QDRO, and that the plan administrator would               
          make the distribution pursuant to the QDRO.                                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011