Service Employees International Union - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
               For its taxable year ending June 30, 1998, 100 Oak Street              
          did not file a timely section 6033(a)(1) return.  On November 1,            
          1999, respondent assessed a section 6652(c)(1) penalty of $2,460            
          against 100 Oak Street for failure to timely file a section                 
          6033(a)(1) return.  A notice of deficiency was not issued.                  
               Pursuant to section 6330(a), respondent issued 100 Oak                 
          Street a Final Notice of Intent to Levy and Notice of Your Right            
          to a Hearing (notice of intent to levy) on December 18, 2002.  A            
          section 6330 hearing requested by 100 Oak Street was held on                
          December 10, 2003.                                                          
               For its taxable year ending June 30, 1999, Service Employees           
          did not timely file a section 6033(a)(1) return.  On April 8,               
          2002, respondent assessed a section 6652(c)(1) penalty of $50,000           
          against Service Employees for failure to timely file a section              
          6033(a)(1) return.  A notice of deficiency was not issued.                  
               Pursuant to section 6330(a), respondent issued Service                 
          Employees a notice of intent to levy on August 13, 2002.  Service           
          Employees requested a section 6330 hearing, which was held on               
          September 10, 2003.                                                         
               On April 23, 2004, respondent sent each petitioner a Notice            
          of Determination Concerning Collection Actions Under Section                
          6330, upholding the respective levies.  On May 21, 2004,                    
          petitioners filed petitions with this Court seeking review of               
          respondent’s determinations.                                                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011