Michael and Marla Sklar - Page 28

                                       - 28 -                                         
               Petitioners contend that Emek and Yeshiva Rav Isacsohn were            
          organized exclusively as religious organizations because                    
          respondent excused both from filing Forms 990, Return of                    
          Organization Exempt From Income Tax.14  We disagree.                        
          Organizations exempt from tax under section 501(a) generally are            
          required to file Forms 990.  Sec. 6033(a)(1).  However, churches,           
          exempt organizations with gross receipts of not more than $5,000,           
          and exclusively religious activities of any religious order are             
          exempt from that requirement.  The Commissioner may relieve any             
          exempt organization from filing a return where the Commissioner             
          determines that filing is not necessary to the efficient                    
          administration of the internal revenue laws.  Sec. 6033(a)(2)(B).           
               Emek and Yeshiva Rav Isacsohn do not qualify for the                   
          exception to the general filing requirement provided in section             
          6033(a)(2)(A).  Neither school is a church, an exempt                       
          organization with gross receipts of not more than $5,000, or a              
          religious order.  Given that Emek and Yeshiva Rav Isacsohn were             
          treated as charitable organizations described in section                    
          170(b)(1)(A)(ii), i.e., educational organizations, we infer that            
          the Commissioner exercised discretion under section 6033(a)(2)(B)           
          to except Emek and Yeshiva Rav Isacsohn from filing Forms 990.              

               14  Petitioners rely in part on a letter from respondent’s             
          counsel to petitioners’ counsel that petitioners attached to                
          their reply brief.  Because the letter in question was not                  
          offered into evidence at trial, the letter was returned to                  
          petitioners unfiled and is not part of the record.                          





Page:  Previous  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011