- 5 - retirement plans are defined to include IRAs as defined in section 408(a) and (b). Secs. 72(t)(1), 4974(c). There is no dispute as to whether petitioner’s IRAs are “qualified retirement plans” for purposes of section 72(t). The 10-percent additional tax does not apply to certain distributions from qualified retirement plans, including distributions made after an employee attains age 59� and distributions attributable to the employee’s disability. Sec. 72(t)(2)(A)(i), (iii); see sec. 72(t)(2). For purposes of section 72, an employee is disabled if she is “unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical condition or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or to be of long-continued and indefinite duration.” Sec. 72(m)(7). Petitioner was born in 1958. The distributions from her IRAs were made in 1999 and 2000. Because petitioner had not attained the age of 59� at the time of the distributions, the exception found in section 72(t)(2)(A)(i) does not apply. During 1999 and 2000, petitioner was employed by Cypress and was running her own startup network marketing business. Although petitioner testified that the condition of her health slowed her down and forced her to switch from full-time to part-time work during 2000, petitioner was still able to engage in substantially gainful activity. See sec. 72(m)(7). Because petitioner was notPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011