John A. Walz, Jr. - Page 10

                                        - 9 -                                         
          exercise control over petitioner in specifying when he plays, in            
          determining the length of his performance, when he participates             
          in rehearsals, whether he can take breaks, which dress uniform he           
          is required to wear, and in making him subject to the                       
          instructions of the conductor.  The musical organization provides           
          the place for rehearsals, the place for performances, and the               
          music used.  Petitioner has the opportunity to work for an hourly           
          wage and we note he was an economically successful musician even            
          after deduction of allowable expenses.  His performances are                
          obviously part of the principal’s regular business.  Petitioner             
          has had a long-term relationship with at least two significant              
          musical organizations.  Petitioner never held himself out as an             
          independent contractor to the musical organizations.  He did so             
          only when he filed his original return for 2000.  He retreated              
          from that position when he filed his amended return, in effect              
          admitting he was an employee.  The musical organizations treated            
          him as an employee, considered him to be an employee, issued                
          Forms W-2, made withholding of various taxes, and made pension              
          contributions on his behalf.                                                
               Weighing all the facts and circumstances, we find that                 
          petitioner was an employee during the year in issue.                        
               We turn to the issue of whether petitioner is entitled to              
          deduct certain expenses.  Respondent disallowed petitioner’s                
          Schedule C deductions in full and determined that petitioner did            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011