John A. Walz, Jr. - Page 13

                                       - 12 -                                         
          place of each separate expenditure, and the business purpose for            
          an expenditure or use.  Sec. 274(d); sec. 1.274-5T(b), Temporary            
          Income Tax Regs., 50 Fed. Reg. 46014 (Nov. 6, 1985).  To                    
          substantiate a deduction by means of adequate records, a taxpayer           
          must maintain an account book, diary, log, statement of expense,            
          trip sheets, and/or other documentary evidence, which, in                   
          combination, are sufficient to establish each element of                    
          expenditure or use.  The log must be made at or near the time of            
          the expenditure.  Sec. 1.274-5T(c)(2)(i) and (ii), Temporary                
          Income Tax Regs., 50 Fed. Reg. 46017 (Nov. 6, 1985).                        
               Petitioner is entitled to deduct $350 for interest on                  
          purchases of business items and $1,874 for expenses relating to             
          his computer.  The computer was used to send “CD” labels to                 
          conductors and booking agents.  Petitioner paid $1,000 for tax              
          return preparation and he is entitled to deduct that amount.                
               Section 280A limits the allowance of deductions related to             
          the use of a home office.  There is an exception if a portion of            
          the house is used exclusively on a regular basis as the principal           
          place of business for the taxpayer’s trade or business.  Sec.               
          280A(c)(1)(A).  Section 280A(c) requires that the taxpayer “use             
          the portion of the home solely for the purpose of carrying on a             
          trade or business and that there be no personal use of that part            
          of the home.”  Sengpiehl v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-23.               
               Petitioner claimed a $8,542 deduction for home office                  






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011