Ann M. Wilson - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined a deficiency of $1,913 in petitioner’s           
          Federal income tax for the taxable year 2002.  The issues for               
          decision are:  (1) Whether petitioner qualifies as a head of                
          household under section 2(b), and (2) whether petitioner                    
          qualifies for the earned income credit under section 32(a).                 
                                     Background                                       
               Some of the facts have been stipulated, and they are so                
          found.  The stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are              
          incorporated by this reference.  At the time of filing the                  
          petition, petitioner resided in Lakeside, California.                       
               Petitioner previously was married to Warren Wilson (Mr.                
          Wilson), and the two resided in Indiana as husband and wife.1               
          Petitioner and Mr. Wilson were divorced sometime in 1997.  During           
          their marriage, petitioner and Mr. Wilson had three children.               
          Their daughter RW2 was born in 1985.  Under the divorce decree              
          petitioner was awarded custody of RW and given the right to claim           
          her as a dependent for Federal and State income tax purposes.               
          Petitioner did not claim RW as a dependent on her 2002 return;              
          however, Mr. Wilson apparently did claim RW on his 2002 return.             
               In January 2000, petitioner moved from Indiana to San Diego,           
          California, to attend Thomas Jefferson School of Law (law                   


               1 The record is unclear as to the exact date petitioner and            
          Mr. Wilson were married.                                                    
               2 The Court uses only the minor child’s initials.                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011