James Weldon Aaron - Page 15

                                       - 14 -                                         
          balance of assessment was $5,000 or more” and thereby violated              
          section 6330(c).  We disagree.                                              
               IRM sec. 5.12.2.8.2 (March 1, 2004)5 states that a notice of           
          Federal tax lien generally should not be filed if the taxpayer’s            
          aggregate unpaid balance of assessment is less than $5,000.  It             
          also states, however, that a notice “may be filed when, in the              
          judgment of the revenue officer, it is in the best interest of              
          the government to record the lien” and a group manager approves.            
          IRM sec. 5.12.2.8.2(1)(a).  Thus, there is no absolute                      
          prohibition on filing a notice of Federal tax lien if the unpaid            
          balance of assessment is less than $5,000.                                  
               Even if respondent did fail to comply with the provisions of           
          the IRM, those provisions govern only the internal affairs of the           
          Internal Revenue Service; they do not have the force and effect             
          of law.  Valen Manufacturing Co. v. United States, 90 F.3d 1190,            
          1194 (6th Cir. 1996); United States v. Horne, 714 F.2d 206, 207             
          (1st Cir. 1983); see also Miller v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 184,             
          195 (2000) (“The authoritative sources of Federal tax law are the           
          statutes, regulations, and judicial decisions”), affd. sub nom.             
          Lovejoy v. Commissioner, 293 F.3d 1208 (10th Cir. 2002).  The               
          procedures in the IRM do not confer rights on taxpayers.  United            

               5  The notice of determination refers to IRM sec. 5.12.1.13            
          (Apr. 30, 2002), which was replaced by IRM sec. 5.12.2.8.1 and              
          5.12.2.8.2 (Mar. 1, 2004).  For purposes of this opinion, there             
          is no substantive difference between the older and newer IRM                
          provisions.                                                                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011