- 5 - INT as provided by Nationwide. Petitioner disagrees with respondent’s determination. Although not raised by the parties, under section 7491(a), the burden of proof with respect to any factual issue will shift to respondent if petitioner’s testimony with respect to the issue is credible. At trial, petitioner testified that the life insurance policies were owned by his father, despite their having his Social Security number on them, and that he neither owned, nor knew himself to be a beneficiary, of either one of the policies at issue. Petitioner further stated that he did not recall making any type of premium payments to Nationwide Life Insurance Company, and that he did not receive any income from either of the policies during the taxable year at issue. Petitioner also testified that his parents never indicated to him that they had purchased a life insurance policy on his behalf. According to petitioner, the only insurance that he had was through AquaProof and that was with an entirely different insurance company. Respondent, who has the burden of production as to this issue pursuant to section 6201(d), offered no evidence to rebut petitioner’s testimony, which we find credible. We accordingly conclude that petitioner did not receive any income from Nationwide in taxable year 2003, and that if he did have any interest in the policies it was, at best, as a nomineePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011