- 10 - sales, and the value could be realized only if the conduit was actually sold. Qwest hired Coopers & Lybrand LLP (CLC), a professional consulting firm, to review its 1995 five-year plan. CLC determined: (1) The demand for long-distance conduit builds had slowed; (2) the country did not need another nationwide fiberoptic network; (3) the creation of another network could not be justified in terms of capacity or cost; (4) Qwest would be at a cost disadvantage to existing nationwide carriers, such as MCI, AT&T, and Sprint; (5) Qwest’s installation of additional conduit would be “very risky”; and (6) Qwest’s revenue projections “may be optimistic”. Qwest’s Board of Directors minutes for the period January 22, 1994, through December 23, 1996, do not contain any resolutions approving any of the five-year plans. B. Construction Projects During the years in issue, Qwest engaged in 21 construction projects, 19 of which were for third-party customers.6 During the years in issue, Qwest performed the majority of the construction, only subcontracting out small portions of the work. In four construction projects, Qwest installed conduit or pulled fiber for third-party customers without retaining assets for 6 The Cal Fiber and Dallas-Houston projects were not done for third-party customers.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011