Roy and Antonette Barnes - Page 14

                                       - 14 -                                         
          collectibility with special circumstances, the Commissioner                 
          evaluates such an offer by applying the same factors (economic              
          hardship or considerations of public policy or equity) as in the            
          case of an offer-in-compromise to promote effective tax                     
          administration.  See IRM sec. 5.8.11.2.1 and .2.  In accordance             
          with the Commissioner’s guidelines, an offer-in-compromise due to           
          doubt as to collectibility with special circumstances should not            
          be accepted even when economic hardship or considerations of                
          public policy or equity circumstances are identified, if the                
          taxpayer does not offer an acceptable amount.  See IRM sec.                 
          5.8.11.2.1.11 and .12.                                                      
               Cochran considered all of the evidence submitted to her by             
          petitioners and applied the guidelines for evaluating an                    
          offer-in-compromise due to doubt as to collectibility with                  
          special circumstances or to promote effective tax administration.           
          As to the former, Cochran determined that petitioners’ offer was            
          unacceptable because they were able to pay more than the $32,000            
          that they offered to compromise their tax liability.  As to the             
          latter, Cochran determined that petitioners’ offer did not                  
          qualify as an offer-in-compromise to promote effective tax                  
          administration because petitioners were unable to pay their                 
          liability in full.  Cochran’s determination to reject                       
          petitioners’ offer-in-compromise was not arbitrary, capricious,             
          or without a sound basis in fact or law, and it was not abusive             






Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011