- 3 - On October 11, 2001, respondent sent petitioner a letter stating that his 2000 return could not be filed. Respondent informed petitioner that his claims had been repeatedly rejected as frivolous and without merit, and that he could be subject to a penalty under section 6702 of $500 for filing a frivolous return. To avoid the assessment of the penalty and to prevent a notice of deficiency from being issued, respondent advised petitioner to file an amended return within 30 days. On November 20, 2001, petitioner sent a letter to respondent demanding to see “if you have the authority to determine whether anyone’s tax return is ‘frivolous’”. Petitioner requested a meeting with respondent to “present my case or defense by oral and documented evidence, and submit rebuttal evidence, and conduct such cross-examination as may be required for a full and true disclosure of the facts”. On May 15, 2002, respondent sent petitioner two letters indicating that respondent could not process petitioner’s 1999 or 2000 Federal income tax return. Respondent informed petitioner that penalties under section 6702 would be assessed and returns would be prepared for him. Respondent prepared substitutes for returns for petitioner using information provided by third parties. On September 18, 2002, respondent sent petitioner notices of deficiency for 1999 and 2000. For 1999, respondent determined aPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011