- 5 - October 3, 2003. In the request, petitioner states: “IRS does not follow procedures. I request a certificate of assessment for the amount that IRS claims I owe.” On three occasions, respondent sent petitioner letters informing him that his arguments have previously been determined to be frivolous.2 Respondent advised petitioner that he was not entitled to a face-to-face hearing unless he informed respondent of any specific and relevant issues he wished respondent to consider. If petitioner did not raise any relevant issues, respondent stated that the hearing would be conducted over the telephone or through correspondence. In response to the first two letters, petitioner sent additional requests for a face-to-face hearing.3 Petitioner did not raise any relevant issues, but instead informed respondent that he would tape record the hearing and would be accompanied by a court reporter and a witness. Petitioner also requested that respondent bring several documents to the hearing, including a summary record of assessment, the tax returns on which the assessment was based, and the notice and demand for payment. On September 27, 2004, respondent scheduled a telephone conference with petitioner for October 20, 2004. Respondent 2 Respondent’s letters were dated May 12, June 7, and Sept. 27, 2004. 3 Petitioner’s requests were dated May 27 and June 18, 2004.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011