Lori Ann Champagne, Petitioner, and Darrin W. Champagne, Intervenor - Page 9

                                        - 8 -                                         
               Relief under section 6015(c) is not available if the                   
          Commissioner demonstrates that the requesting spouse had actual             
          knowledge, at the time the return was signed, of any item giving            
          rise to a deficiency (or portion thereof) that is not allocable             
          to such individual.  Sec. 6015(c)(3)(C); Hopkins v. Commissioner,           
          121 T.C. 73, 86 (2003); Culver v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 189, 194           
          (2001).  Petitioner has the burden of proving which items would             
          not have been allocated to her if the spouses had filed separate            
          returns.  See Mora v. Commissioner, supra at 290; Levy v.                   
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2005-92.                                           
               Both this Court and the Court of Appeals for the Fifth                 
          Circuit have defined culpable knowledge in an omitted income                
          case, for purposes of section 6015(c)(3)(C), as the “actual and             
          clear awareness” of the item, as distinguished from mere reason             
          to know of the item.  Cheshire v. Commissioner, supra at 337                
          n.26; Cook v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2005-22.  While the                  
          taxpayer generally has the burden of proof, in order to preclude            
          relief under section 6015(c) the Commissioner must carry the                
          burden of demonstrating by a preponderance of the evidence that             
          the requesting spouse had actual knowledge of “any item giving              
          rise to a deficiency”.  Rule 142(a)(1); Culver v. Commissioner,             
          supra at 196; Charlton v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 333, 341-342               
          (2000); sec. 1.6015-3(c)(2)(i), Income Tax Regs.  “Item” means              







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011