Jose R. Christopher - Page 4

                                        - 3 -                                         
          instituted levy proceedings on retirement income petitioner was             
          receiving from his prior employment as a police officer for the             
          City of New York.  For the year 2004, petitioner received                   
          $30,979.21 in retirement benefits from the City of New York                 
          retirement system.  During 2004 and since, petitioner has been              
          employed by the U.S. Department of Transportation, which                    
          petitioner referred to as “Homeland Security”, and his salary for           
          2004 from that employment was $24,752.63.  Thus, petitioner’s two           
          sources of income during 2004 totaled $55,771.84.                           
               Prior to consummation of the levy of petitioner’s retirement           
          benefits, respondent had issued a notice of intent to levy.                 
          Petitioner consciously did not appeal that notice and allowed the           
          levy to proceed.  Pursuant to that levy, respondent has been                
          collecting monthly amounts of $1,392.15 from petitioner’s New               
          York retirement benefits.  The levy has continued, and, upon                
          respondent’s issuance of the notice of Federal tax lien,                    
          petitioner requested a hearing and applied for a release and                
          cancellation of the levy, seeking in place of the levy the                  
          continued payment of $1,392.15 per month toward liquidation of              
          his past years’ tax liabilities as an installment agreement.                
               In connection with the relief sought, petitioner was                   
          required to and did provide a current financial statement to                
          respondent’s Appeals Office.  Based on the financial data                   







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011