Samuel A. Cole - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
               Additionally, the notice applied a 10-percent additional tax           
          of $400 to petitioner’s distribution from his IRA funds, because,           
          according to the notice of deficiency, he did not roll over the             
          distribution into another qualified retirement plan, he was not             
          disabled, or he was not at least 59-1/2 years old at the time of            
          the distribution.  The notice also added the $17 of interest                
          received from the Commonwealth of Virginia to petitioner’s                  
          income.                                                                     
                                       OPINION                                        
          Statutory Employee                                                          
               Statutory employees may report their compensation, less                
          related expenses, as business income on Schedule C and thus may             
          avoid limitations on deduction of employee business expenses and            
          other itemized deductions reportable on Schedule A of individual            
          income tax returns.  See Prouty v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-           
          175; Hathaway v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-389.  An                     
          individual is a statutory employee under section 3121(d)(3) only            
          if such individual is not a common law employee under section               
          3121(d)(2).  Ewens & Miller, Inc. v. Commissioner, 117 T.C. 263,            
          269 (2001).  Whether an individual is a common law employee under           
          section 3121(d)(2) is a question of fact.  See Nationwide Mut.              
          Ins. Co. v. Darden, 503 U.S. 318, 322-324 (1992); Profl. &                  
          Executive Leasing, Inc. v. Commissioner, 89 T.C. 225, 232 (1987),           







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011