Jon David Cooksey - Page 9

                                        - 8 -                                         
          (2) (Aug. 20, 1998) (whether mistake gives rise to reasonable               
          cause depends in part upon taxpayer's timely steps to correct the           
          failure after its discovery); cf. Elec. & Neon, Inc. v.                     
          Commissioner, 56 T.C. 1324, 1342-1343 (1971) (lack of necessary             
          information not reasonable cause for 8-month delay in filing                
          where return preparers obtained information to complete, and did            
          complete, return 12 days after due date).                                   
               Under section 7491(c), the Commissioner bears the burden of            
          production with respect to a taxpayer's liability for any                   
          addition to tax.  To meet that burden, the Commissioner must                
          adduce "sufficient evidence indicating that it is appropriate to            
          impose the relevant penalty."  Higbee v. Commissioner, 116 T.C.             
          438, 446 (2001).  Once the Commissioner meets the initial burden            
          of production, the taxpayer bears the burden of proving that the            
          Commissioner's determination was incorrect; e.g., that the                  
          taxpayer's failure to pay was due to reasonable cause and was not           
          due to willful neglect.  Id. at 447.                                        
               Here, it is undisputed that the tax shown as due on                    
          petitioner's return was $119,849, whereas the amount paid by the            
          April 16, 2001, due date of the return was $87,945.4  We                    
          accordingly find that respondent has met his burden of production           
          under section 7491(c).                                                      

               4 This figure consists of petitioner's two timely estimated            
          tax payments of $32,157 each, and the $23,631 payment                       
          accompanying the return.  See supra note 2.                                 




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011