Jon David Cooksey - Page 12

                                       - 11 -                                         
          facts and circumstances surrounding his failure to pay respondent           
          until November 2002, we do not believe the foregoing arrangements           
          constitute the exercise of ordinary business care and prudence.             
          Thus, petitioner has not shown that his failure to make timely              
          payment of $32,157 of his 2000 income tax liability is due to               
          reasonable cause.  We accordingly hold that petitioner is liable            
          for an addition to tax under section 6651(a)(2).6                           
          Section 6654 Addition to Tax                                                
               Section 6654(a) imposes an addition to tax for failure to              
          pay estimated income tax where prepayments of such tax, either              
          through withholding or by making estimated quarterly tax payments           
          during the course of the year, do not equal the percentage of               
          total liability required under the statute, unless the taxpayer             
          shows that one of the statutory exceptions applies.  Sec.                   
          6654(a); Niedringhaus v. Commissioner, 99 T.C. 202, 222 (1992).             
          The amount required to be paid through each such estimated                  
          quarterly payment is 25 percent of the "required annual payment".           
          Sec. 6654(d)(1)(A).  The "required annual payment" is, in turn,             
          the lesser of 90 percent of the tax shown on the return for that            


               6 We suggested above that there might have been reasonable             
          cause for the failure to pay during some period before petitioner           
          was sent reasonable notice, by virtue of the State of Missouri's            
          refund check, that his estimated tax payment had been                       
          misdirected.  However, petitioner, who has the burden to show               
          reasonable cause, has not established when in 2001 the refund               
          check was sent.  We therefore have no basis on which to demarcate           
          the period for which there may have been reasonable cause.                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011