W. Bradford Davis and Tedde M. Rinker - Page 37

                                        - 37 -                                        
          (b).  Finally, the Quicken report, even when coupled with                   
          petitioners’ testimony, does not satisfy the requirements imposed           
          by section 1.213-1(h), Income Tax Regs.9  We therefore disallow the         
          deduction for medical expenses for 1999.                                    
               B.  Personal Interest                                                  
               Petitioners deducted $20,903 of interest related to the                
          refinancing of their home mortgage.  Respondent denied the                  
          deduction.                                                                  
               Petitioners refinanced a preexisting home mortgage loan on             
          December 17, 1998.  The terms of the December 17, 1998, refinance           
          loan (the 1998 loan) required petitioners to pay a $7,500 “loan             
          origination fee” at the inception of the 1998 loan.  The stated             
          term of the 1998 loan was apparently 30 years.  However, on                 
          March 28, 2000, petitioners again refinanced their home and paid            
          off the 1998 loan in its entirety.                                          
               At trial, petitioners attempted to revive only $5,862 of the           
          $20,903 deducted on their return.  They argued that the loan                
          origination fee constituted prepaid interest, and that because the          
          1998 loan lasted only 467 days, the bulk of the loan origination            




               9  It is unclear whether the dates on the report indicate              
          the date of payment, as required, or the date on which                      
          petitioners entered the data into their computer.  The Quicken              
          report also fails to adequately substantiate the address of any             
          payees as required by the regulation.                                       





Page:  Previous  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011