W. Bradford Davis and Tedde M. Rinker - Page 41

                                       - 41 -                                         
          IV.  Penalties                                                              
               A.  Section 6662(a)                                                    
               Respondent determined an accuracy-related penalty under                
          section 6662(a) of $8,021.80.  Respondent determined that the               
          entire underpayment of tax for 1999 was attributable to                     
          negligence or disregard of rules or regulations, a substantial              
          understatement of income tax, and/or a substantial valuation                
          misstatement.14 Petitioners argue that the underpayments for 1999           
          were caused by their reasonable reliance on Mr. Hertz in                    
          preparing their return. This reliance, petitioners argue,                   
          qualifies as “reasonable cause and good faith”, and under section           
          6664(c)(1), the penalty should not be sustained.                            
               1.  Burden of Production                                               
          Section 7491(c) provides that the Commissioner will bear the                
          burden of production with respect to the liability of any                   
          individual for additions to tax and penalties.  “The                        
          Commissioner’s burden of production under section 7491(c) is to             
          produce evidence that it is appropriate to impose the relevant              
          penalty, addition to tax, or additional amount”.  Swain v.                  
          Commissioner, 118 T.C. 358, 363 (2002); see also Higbee v.                  


               14  Although the notice of deficiency includes “substantial            
          valuation overstatement” (sic) as a basis for applying the                  
          accuracy-related penalty, it appears that respondent did not                
          determine any tax deficiency based on a valuation overstatement.            
          We therefore do not address the aspects of the accuracy-related             
          penalty which relate to a substantial valuation overstatement.              





Page:  Previous  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011