Steven Arnold Diem - Page 5

                                        - 4 -                                         

          years of service.  Because of the representation that the                   
          nonindustrial disability benefits did not constitute gross                  
          income, and considering further that the litigation that was                
          threatened by the city could be protracted and the outcome                  
          uncertain, petitioner and his attorney agreed that petitioner               
          would accept the nonindustrial benefits.  He began drawing the              
          nonindustrial benefits in 1997 and received $16,617 that year.              
          On the Federal income tax return prepared by petitioner for 1997,           
          the $16,617 was reported as pension income, but, on line 21 of              
          Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, he listed a                   
          negative income amount of $16,617, which he described on line 21            
          of the return as “nontaxable pension in lieu of workers comp.”              
          In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined that the                 
          $16,617 constituted gross income.2                                          
               In general, gross income includes “all income from whatever            
          source derived”.  Sec. 61(a).  However, section 104(a)(1)                   
          excludes from gross income “amounts received under workmen’s                
          compensation acts as compensation for personal injuries or                  
          sickness”.                                                                  

               2Since this issue involves a question of law as to whether             
          the pension income is taxable, and there are no facts in dispute,           
          the Court decides the issue without regard to the burden of                 
          proof.  See sec. 7491(a).  As to the sec. 6651(a)(1) addition to            
          tax, the burden of production is on respondent under sec.                   
          7491(c).  However, the burden of proof remains on petitioner to             
          persuade the Court the imposition of the addition to tax is                 
          incorrect.  Higbee v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 438, 446-447 (2001).           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011