Steven Arnold Diem - Page 7

                                        - 6 -                                         

          the benefits under that program were based upon petitioner’s age            
          and length of service.  Such benefits, therefore, do not qualify            
          under section 104(a)(1) and section 1.104-1(b), Income Tax Regs.,           
          quoted above.  The benefits paid to petitioner, therefore, are              
          includable in gross income.                                                 
               Petitioner contends, however, that the city of San                     
          Francisco, through its representatives, as well as an agent of              
          the IRS, assured him and his attorney that the benefits under the           
          nonindustrial disability retirement system were in lieu of                  
          workmen’s compensation benefits, and that the nonindustrial                 
          disability benefits would not constitute gross income.  The Court           
          concludes otherwise because the benefits were based upon age and            
          length of service and were not based upon personal injuries or              
          sickness.  Whatever advice or representation that was made to               
          petitioner has no bearing upon the Court’s decision here.  The              
          law is well settled that the Commissioner is not estopped and               
          cannot be bound by erroneous acts or omissions of his agents or             
          representations by other parties such as the employer.                      
          Authoritative tax law is contained in statutes, regulations, and            
          judicial decisions.  Zimmerman v. Commissioner, 71 T.C. 367, 371            
          (1978), affd. without published opinion 614 F.2d 1294 (2d Cir.              
          1979); Green v. Commissioner, 59 T.C. 456, 458 (1972).  A                   
          taxpayer cannot prevail simply because he relied on incorrect               
          advice from his attorney regarding the tax consequences of the              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011