Estate of Lorraine C. Disbrow, Deceased, Martha D. Johnson, Executrix - Page 25

                                        -25-                                          
          to Funny Hats is determined from all of the facts and                       
          circumstances surrounding both the transfer itself and the                  
          subsequent use of the residence.  See Estate of Abraham v.                  
          Commissioner, supra at 39.  We carefully scrutinize the facts and           
          circumstances of a case such as this that involves an intrafamily           
          transaction.  See Estate of Hartshorne v. Commissioner, 402 F.2d            
          592, 594 n.2 (2d Cir. 1968), affg. 48 T.C. 882 (1967); Estate of            
          Huntington v. Commissioner, 100 T.C. 313, 316 (1993); Estate of             
          Labombarde v. Commissioner, 58 T.C. 745 (1972), affd. per curiam            
          without published opinion 502 F.2d 1158 (1st Cir. 1973); cf.                
          Estate of Abraham v. Commissioner, supra at 39; Estate of Maxwell           
          v. Commissioner, 98 T.C. at 602.                                            
               Section 7491 was added to the Code by the Internal Revenue             
          Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, Pub. L. 105-206,              
          sec. 3001(c), 112 Stat. 727, effective for court proceedings                
          arising from examinations commencing after July 22, 1998.                   
          Section 7491(a)(1) provides that the burden of proof is on the              
          Commissioner in specified circumstances.  While petitioner makes            
          no argument that section 7491(a)(1) applies here, we need not and           
          do not decide whether petitioner has met all of the prerequisites           
          for that section to apply.  See, e.g., sec. 7491(a)(2) (section             
          7491(a)(1) applies only when certain limitations are met).  We              
          decide this case without regard to which party bears the burden             
          of proof.  Specifically, on the basis of the record at hand, we             






Page:  Previous  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011