Jerry and Patricia A. Dixon, et al. - Page 69

                                        - 69 -                                        
          case petitioners Darrell Hatcher (now deceased), Robert Norrell,            
          and Don Hunt are jointly and severally liable for the Fund’s                
          obligations under the agreement, which would include the                    
          remaining potentially compensable fees and expenses of                      
          $188,049.27 ($248,049.27 - $60,000 = $188,049.27).  Since we have           
          received net worth affidavits for Messrs. Norrell and Hunt, it              
          follows that eligible persons are liable for, and therefore                 
          incurred, the remaining potentially compensable fees and expenses           
          of $188,049.27.53                                                           
                    4.   Summary                                                      
               Eligible persons have paid or incurred all the potentially             
          compensable amounts with respect to the appellate fee requests.             
               G. Final Figures                                                       
               We shall award (1) attorney’s fees in the amount of                    
          $158,562.50 ($122,293.30 paid through the Defense Fund and                  
          $36,269.20 paid outside the Defense Fund) in respect of the                 
          Hongsermeiers’ appellate fee request, and (2) attorney’s fees and           






          53 Respondent does not suggest, nor do we have any reason to                
          believe, that the disproportionate liability of Messrs. Norrell             
          and Hunt is not bona fide.  Cf. Sisk, “The Essentials of the                
          Equal Access to Justice Act:  Court Awards of Attorney’s Fees for           
          Unreasonable Government Conduct (Part One),” 55 La. L. Rev. 217,            
          337-341 (1994) (discussing the potential for manipulation of the            
          EAJA eligibility requirements when counsel represents both                  
          eligible and ineligible parties).                                           




Page:  Previous  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011