- 132 - (1988); Asciutto v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-564, affd. 26 F.3d 108 (9th Cir. 1994). Section 6601(e)(1) expressly provides that interest prescribed by section 6601 is treated as tax “except [for purposes of] subchapter B of chapter 63, relating to deficiency procedures”. Because this exception excludes interest from the definition of “tax” for purposes of section 6211(a) (defining the term “deficiency”), it follows that such interest is not treated as part of the underlying deficiency. See White v. Commissioner, 95 T.C. 209, 213 (1990). In contrast, as we recognized in Lincir v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 293, 298 (2000), affd. 32 Fed. Appx. 278 (9th Cir. 2002), section 6601(e) does not curtail our jurisdiction over interest on overpayments of taxes. Instead, the Court does have jurisdiction to redetermine statutory interest where a taxpayer has properly invoked the Court’s overpayment jurisdiction pursuant to section 6512. The cases before the Court, however, involve both interest owed by petitioners on deficiencies, over which we arguably lack jurisdiction, and interest owed by respondent on overpayments, over which we clearly have jurisdiction. This possible divergence in our jurisdictional authority has the potential, at least, for interfering with our execution of the mandates of the Court of Appeals, which, we believe, requirePage: Previous 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011