- 14 - petitioner provided no information demonstrating the extent to which Ms. Felton’s family loss prevented the corporation from filing its return. See Tokarski v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. at 77. On the basis of the record before us, we therefore conclude that petitioner did not demonstrate that its failure to timely file a return was due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect. See sec. 301.6651-1(c), Proced. & Admin. Regs.; sec. 1.6161-1(b), Income Tax Regs. Accordingly, petitioner is liable for the addition to tax under section 6651(a)(1) for 2002. Conclusion We have considered all of the other arguments made by petitioner, and, to the extent that we have not specifically addressed them, we conclude that they are without merit. Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case Division. To reflect our disposition of the disputed issues, Decision will be entered for respondent as to the deficiencies in tax and the addition to tax under section 6651(a)(1) for 2002 in the amount of $1,116.60.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Last modified: May 25, 2011