- 7 - the claim was barred by the statute of limitations. See Smith v. Ferguson, 160 S.W.3d 115, 124 (Tex. Ct. App. 2005). 1986 Tax Liability With respect to the 1986 Federal income tax returns of Ms. Smith and petitioner, the divorce agreement provided as follows: Manner of Preparing U.S. Individual Income Tax Return for 1986. Each party shall file a separate U.S. Individual Income Tax Return for the year 1986. Section 66 of the Internal Revenue Code is useable and applicable by spouse in 1986. * * *[Ms. Smith and petitioner] each agree that they will file their separate returns for 1986 in accordance with said section and pay the tax computed under said separate returns. The Internal Revenue Service examined petitioner’s 1986 Federal income tax return. In docket No. 5841-92, this Court entered a stipulated decision with respect to petitioner’s 1986 Federal income tax liability. Petitioner added, as a cause of action in his aforementioned State court suit against Ms. Smith, a claim that Ms. Smith breached the divorce agreement by failing to file a proper 1986 Federal income tax return and causing petitioner to pay Ms. Smith’s Federal income tax liability for that year. As with the claims discussed above, the trial court granted Ms. Smith’s motion for summary judgment with respect to the aforementioned breach claim on grounds that petitioner had agreed pursuant to the 1989 settlement agreement not to reopen the divorce case or the divorce agreement. The trial court held petitioner to bePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011