Searcy M. Ferguson, Jr., and Elizabeth L. Ferguson - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
          the claim was barred by the statute of limitations.  See Smith v.           
          Ferguson, 160 S.W.3d 115, 124 (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).                         
          1986 Tax Liability                                                          
               With respect to the 1986 Federal income tax returns of Ms.             
          Smith and petitioner, the divorce agreement provided as follows:            
                    Manner of Preparing U.S. Individual Income Tax                    
               Return for 1986.  Each party shall file a separate U.S.                
               Individual Income Tax Return for the year 1986.                        
               Section 66 of the Internal Revenue Code is useable and                 
               applicable by spouse in 1986.  * * *[Ms. Smith and                     
               petitioner] each agree that they will file their                       
               separate returns for 1986 in accordance with said                      
               section and pay the tax computed under said separate                   
               returns.                                                               
               The Internal Revenue Service examined petitioner’s 1986                
          Federal income tax return.  In docket No. 5841-92, this Court               
          entered a stipulated decision with respect to petitioner’s 1986             
          Federal income tax liability.                                               
               Petitioner added, as a cause of action in his aforementioned           
          State court suit against Ms. Smith, a claim that Ms. Smith                  
          breached the divorce agreement by failing to file a proper 1986             
          Federal income tax return and causing petitioner to pay Ms.                 
          Smith’s Federal income tax liability for that year.  As with the            
          claims discussed above, the trial court granted Ms. Smith’s                 
          motion for summary judgment with respect to the aforementioned              
          breach claim on grounds that petitioner had agreed pursuant to              
          the 1989 settlement agreement not to reopen the divorce case or             
          the divorce agreement.  The trial court held petitioner to be               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011