Larry J. and Catherine E. France - Page 18

                                       - 17 -                                         
          employer contributions to the extent such amounts (1) constitute            
          “payment for the permanent loss or loss of use of a member or               
          function of the body, or the permanent disfigurement” of the                
          taxpayer, and (2) are computed “with reference to the nature of             
          the injury without regard to the period the employee is absent              
          from work.”  Courts have interpreted section 105(c) to exclude              
          payments from gross income only if the plan or contract under               
          which such payments are made varies the amount of the payments              
          according to the type and severity of the injury suffered by the            
          employee.  Rosen v. United States, 829 F.2d 506, 509-510 (4th               
          Cir. 1987); Beisler v. Commissioner, 814 F.2d 1304, 1307 (9th               
          Cir. 1987), affg. en banc T.C. Memo. 1985-25.                               
               Under the ERS, computation of an ordinary disability                   
          retirement allowance does not vary with the nature of the injury,           
          as required by section 105(c)(2); instead, all members found to             
          be incapacitated and entitled to ordinary disability retirement             
          benefits receive an allowance in the form of an annuity                     
          equivalent to a member’s accumulated contributions at the time of           
          retirement, and a pension based on a formula involving a member’s           
          “average final compensation”.  See Baltimore County Code secs.              
          23-53, 23-54 (1988).  Accordingly, section 105(c) does not apply            
          to exclude from gross income the ordinary disability retirement             
          benefits received by petitioners in taxable year 2000.                      







Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011