Santiago L. Garcia - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         

               Respondent determined a deficiency of $3,228 in Federal                
          income tax and an addition to tax under section 6651(a)(1) in the           
          amount of $152 for petitioner’s 2003 tax year.                              
               The issues for decision are whether, for the year 2003,                
          petitioner is entitled to or responsible for (1) a dependency               
          exemption deduction for one child under section 151(c); (2) head-           
          of-household filing status under section 2(b)(1); (3) the earned            
          income credit under section 32(a); (4) the child and dependent              
          care credit under section 21(a)(1); (5) the child tax credit                
          under section 24(a); and (6) the liability for the late-filing              
          addition to tax under section 6651(a)(1).                                   
               Some of the facts were stipulated.  Those facts, with the              
          exhibits annexed thereto, are so found and are made part hereof.            
          Petitioner’s legal residence at the time the petition was filed             
          was Winter Park, Florida.  For reasons of privacy, the dependent            
          at issue in this case is not identified by name and is referred             
          to as the “child”.                                                          


               1(...continued)                                                        
          liability of the taxpayer.  However, the burden shifts to the               
          Commissioner only if the taxpayer has complied with all                     
          requirements as to substantiation and has maintained the                    
          necessary books and records with respect to the factual issues.             
          The burden does not shift to respondent in this case because                
          petitioner maintained no books and records or any other factual             
          evidence to establish his entitlement to the principal issue, his           
          entitlement to a dependency exemption deduction.  However, as to            
          additions to tax, the burden of production is on respondent.                
          Sec. 7491(c).                                                               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011