Santiago L. Garcia - Page 6

                                        - 5 -                                         

               (1) Pursuant to section 152(e)(2), the custodial parent                
          signs a written declaration that such custodial parent will not             
          claim such child as a dependent, and the noncustodial parent                
          attaches such written declaration to the noncustodial parent’s              
          return for the taxable year;                                                
               (2) pursuant to section 152(e)(3), there is a multiple                 
          support agreement between the parties as provided in section                
          152(c); or                                                                  
               (3) pursuant to section 152(e)(4), there is a qualified pre-           
          1985 instrument providing that the noncustodial parent shall be             
          entitled to any deduction allowable under section 151 for such              
          child, provided that certain other requisites, not pertinent                
          here, are met.                                                              
               None of the above requirements existed in this case.  The              
          custodial parent, the child’s mother, did not sign a written                
          declaration allowing petitioner to claim the dependency exemption           
          deduction, there was no multiple support agreement between                  
          petitioner and the mother, and there was no pre-1985 instrument             
          regarding the child.  Although petitioner claims he provided $272           
          every 2 weeks for the support of the child, that factor alone is            
          not determinative.  Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to the           
          dependency exemption deduction.                                             
               The second issue is petitioner’s entitlement to head-of-               
          household filing status.  With respect to this issue, section               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011