Charlotte and Charles T. Gee - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
               The accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a) does not            
          apply to any portion of an underpayment, however, if it is shown            
          that there was reasonable cause for the taxpayer’s position and             
          that the taxpayer acted in good faith with respect to that                  
          portion.  Sec. 6664(c)(1); sec. 1.6664-4(a), Income Tax Regs.               
          The determination of whether a taxpayer acted with reasonable               
          cause and in good faith is made on a case-by-case basis, taking             
          into account all the pertinent facts and circumstances, the most            
          important of which is the extent of the taxpayer’s effort to                
          assess his or her proper tax liability for the year.  Sec.                  
          1.6664-4(b)(1), Income Tax Regs.  Circumstances that may indicate           
          reasonable cause and good faith include an honest                           
          misunderstanding of law that is reasonable in light of all of the           
          facts and circumstances.  Sec. 1.6664-4(b)(1), Income Tax Regs.             
               While the Commissioner bears the burden of production under            
          section 7491(c), the taxpayer bears the burden of proof with                
          respect to reasonable cause.  Higbee v. Commissioner, supra at              
          446.  The mere fact that we have held against petitioners on the            
          substantive issue does not, in and of itself, require holding for           
          respondent on the penalty.  See Hitchins v. Commissioner, 103               
          T.C. 711, 719-720 (1994) (“Indeed, we have specifically refused             
          to impose * * * [a penalty] where it appeared that the issue was            
          one not previously considered by the Court and the statutory                
          language was not entirely clear.”).                                         
               We agree with petitioners that they made a reasonable                  
          attempt to comply with the Code in circumstances involving an               
          issue of first impression.  We note that respondent has not                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011