Charlotte and Charles T. Gee - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
          referred us to nor have we found any cases that have previously             
          answered the question before us.  Accordingly, in light of all              
          the facts and circumstances, we find petitioners acted reasonably           
          and in good faith with respect to the underpayment for 2002 and             
          are not liable for the accuracy-related penalty under section               
          6662(a).                                                                    
               We have considered the other arguments of the parties and,             
          to the extent not discussed, we conclude that the arguments are             
          irrelevant, moot, or meritless.                                             
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              

                                                  Decision will be entered            
                                             for respondent with respect to           
                                             the deficiency and for                   
                                             petitioners with respect to              
                                             the penalty under section                
                                             6662(a).                                 





















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  

Last modified: May 25, 2011