- 12 - purposes of section 165 depends on the law defining the crime of theft in the jurisdiction where the alleged theft occurred. Monteleone v. Commissioner, 34 T.C. 688, 692 (1960). Fla. Stat. Ann. sec. 812.014 (West 2000) provides: (1) A person commits theft if he or she knowingly obtains or uses, or endeavors to obtain or to use, the property of another with intent to, either temporarily or permanently: (a) Deprive the other person of a right to the property or a benefit from the property. (b) Appropriate the property to his or her own use or to the use of any person not entitled to the use of the property. In the instant case, petitioner has failed to prove that a theft occurred under Florida law. Despite producing, as multiple exhibits at trial and on brief, several lists of checks from BBTS,8 including those in response to respondent’s interrogatories, petitioner has not provided the Court with any credible documentation that supports a theft in the total amount of $1,801,213, $704,500, or $564,711.9 8We note that several of these lists include information about checks that are not a part of the record and are not in evidence. 9For example, petitioner’s reply brief includes three lists of checks. The list entitled “TOTAL Theft Loss” includes 427 checks with a total amount of $909,449.66. There is a “TOTAL DOUBLE DATED CHECKS” list for each of the years 1996-2000, which lists cumulatively include 275 checks totaling $593,940.76. The list entitled “Missing Check Total Amount” includes 348 checks totaling $762,810.34.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011