Gary Lyle Gibson and Mirian Julia Alves - Page 4

                                        - 3 -                                         
         claim dependency exemption deductions for the children for                   
         Federal income tax purposes.  The children resided with their                
         mother for the greater portion of 2003, the tax year in issue.               
              Petitioners timely filed a joint Form 1040, U.S. Individual             
         Income Tax Return, for tax year 2003.  They claimed dependency               
         exemption deductions for the three children in the custody of Mr.            
         Gibson’s former spouse, as well as child tax credits and                     
         additional child tax credits for those children.2  Petitioners did           
         not attach to their return a Form 8332, Release of Claim to                  
         Exemption for Child of Divorced or Separated Parents, or other               
         written declaration by Mr. Gibson’s former spouse.                           
              Respondent determined that petitioners are not eligible for             
         the dependency exemption deductions claimed for the minor                    
         children in the custody of Mr. Gibson’s former spouse, or for the            
         child tax credits or the additional child tax credits claimed for            
         those children.  Accordingly, respondent determined a $3,468                 
         deficiency in tax for petitioners’ 2003 tax year and sent                    
         petitioners a notice of deficiency.  Petitioners timely                      
         petitioned this Court, alleging that they provided more than 50              
         percent of the children’s support during 2003 and are therefore              
         entitled to the claimed dependency exemption deductions, child               
         tax credits, and additional child tax credits.                               


               2Petitioners also claimed a dependency exemption deduction             
          with respect to a fourth child.  Respondent does not challenge              
          the validity of that claim.                                                 




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011