Great Plains Gasification Associates, A Partnership, Transco Coal Gas Company, A Partner Other Than The Tax Matters Partner - Page 36

                                        - 36 -                                        
               As discussed at greater length below, on June 30, 1986, the            
          foreclosure sale was held as scheduled, DOE purchased the                   
          project’s mortgaged assets, and ANR filed an appeal of the                  
          foreclosure proceeding.                                                     
          The Foreclosure Proceedings                                                 
               DOE Initiates Foreclosure Proceedings                                  
               As previously noted, on August 29, 1985, DOE had initiated             
          proceedings in the United States District Court for the District            
          of North Dakota (the District Court) seeking foreclosure of the             
          mortgage and sale of the mortgaged property.  The Government                
          moved for summary judgment.  The partnership resisted, contending           
          that the foreclosure should be conducted in accordance with North           
          Dakota law, which it contended gave the partnership redemption              
          rights for up to 1 year after the foreclosure sale.                         
               District Court Decision                                                
               On January 14, 1986, the District Court granted the                    
          Government’s motion for summary judgment, holding that Federal              
          law applied and gave the partnership no redemption rights.  In              
          its memorandum and order, however, the District Court observed              
          that there was no precedent involving this particular loan                  
          guarantee program, that a determination under the balancing test            
          of United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc., 440 U.S. 715 (1979), was           
          a “close question”, and that of the various options presented to            
          the Court by the parties, “All have merit”.                                 






Page:  Previous  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011