Great Plains Gasification Associates, A Partnership, Transco Coal Gas Company, A Partner Other Than The Tax Matters Partner - Page 37

                                        - 37 -                                        
               On April 7, 1986, the District Court entered an Order and              
          Decree of Foreclosure and Sale that:  (1) Directed the mortgage             
          be foreclosed and the mortgaged assets sold by public auction on            
          May 28, 1986; and (2) held that the partnership and the partners            
          were not entitled to redemption rights.                                     
               On April 18, 1986, the partnership filed a motion to amend             
          the District Court’s April 7, 1986, Order and Decree so as to:              
          (1) Clarify that recovery was limited to the partnership’s assets           
          and the interests of the partners therein; (2) correct the                  
          property descriptions; and (3) defer the foreclosure sale for at            
          least 6 months to enable pending workout negotiations to continue           
          between certain partners and DOE.  With regard to this latter               
          point, the motion stated that the partnership had claimed and               
          passed through to its partners investment tax credits of                    
          approximately $250 million and deductions of approximately $390             
          million and that a substantial part of these credits and                    
          deductions would be subject to recapture if the plant were                  
          disposed of in less than 5 years.  The motion indicated that                
          pending proposals by some of the partners to continue operating             
          the plant and to restructure the DOE-guaranteed indebtedness                
          depended upon the continued availability of the economic value of           
          these tax benefits.  The partnership requested a period for                 
          “equitable redemption” and contended that the foreclosure sale              
          should be deferred pending the partners’ ongoing efforts to                 






Page:  Previous  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011