- 2 - Petitioners timely filed a petition under section 6404(h)1 contesting respondent’s determination. The only issue for decision is whether respondent’s denial of petitioners’ claim for abatement of all interest accrued and assessed with respect to their 2000 tax liability was an abuse of discretion. FINDINGS OF FACT Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found. The stipulation of facts is incorporated herein by this reference. Petitioners resided in Centennial, Colorado, when the petition in this case was filed. During 2000 petitioners withdrew a total of $175,450.31 from two retirement plans: $42,790.81 from a pension plan, and $132,659.50 from a section 401(k) retirement plan, both maintained for the benefit of Mrs. Guerrero. At the time petitioners withdrew the funds, Mrs. Guerrero had yet to retire, nor was she otherwise eligible to permanently withdraw funds from either plan without incurring a 10-percent additional tax for premature pension plan distributions pursuant to section 72(t). Petitioners did not roll the withdrawn funds into an individual retirement account (IRA) within 60 days of the withdrawal dates. 1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code as amended, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011