Kent E. Hovind - Page 3

                                         -3-                                          
          theme park, science center, and museum located in Pensacola,                
          Florida.                                                                    
               The organizational structure petitioner established for the            
          above activities, including petitioner’s purported religious                
          ministry and theme park, apparently was based on various                    
          questionable trust documents purchased from Glenn Stoll, a known            
          promoter of tax avoidance schemes.1                                         
               Among other things, the trust documents petitioner utilized            
          provide as follows:                                                         

               [a] gathering of two or more believers, in agreement                   
               with your calling, forms a lawfully established                        
               unincorporated association of pure trust.  Upon a grant                
               of value, the trust must assign beneficial interest &                  
               appoint a trustee.  This trust agreement, when reduced                 
               to writing, becomes written evidence of a Ministerial                  
               Trust under which you may manage your personal ministry                
               for the church.                                                        

               Petitioner has not filed individual Federal income tax                 
          returns for 1995, 1996, and 1997.                                           
               During an audit and a criminal tax investigation that began            
          in the early spring of 2004, respondent concluded (1) that                  
          petitioner appeared to be using the referred-to trust documents             
          as well as various nominees and sham entities for the purpose of            
          concealing ownership and control of his activities and                      


               1  Aspects of Glenn Stoll’s tax avoidance schemes are                  
          described in United States v. Stoll, 96 AFTR 2d 2005-5044, 2005-2           
          USTC par. 50,459 (W.D. Wash. 2005), and United States v. Stoll,             
          96 AFTR 2d 2005-5052, 2005-2 UTSC par. 50,460 (W.D. Wash. 2005).            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011