Kent E. Hovind - Page 12

                                        -12-                                          
               Respondent argues that petitioner received both respondent’s           
          Lien Notice and respondent’s notice of deficiency and that                  
          petitioner could have filed an appeal or a Tax Court petition               
          with regard to either of those documents, and therefore that                
          petitioner may not now, in the instant proceeding involving                 
          respondent’s levy notice, dispute the existence or amount of his            
          1995, 1996, and 1997 Federal income tax liabilities.                        
          Sec. 6330(c)(2)(B).                                                         
               We agree with respondent.  The evidence adequately                     
          establishes that petitioner received the July 29, 2004, notice of           
          deficiency.                                                                 
               The Postal Service receipt of delivery and the Form 3877               
          constitute strong evidence in support of the mailing by                     
          respondent and the receipt by petitioner of the notice of                   
          deficiency.                                                                 
               Petitioner actually had two opportunities (upon receipt of             
          the Lien Notice -- which receipt petitioner does not dispute --             
          and upon receipt of the notice of deficiency) to challenge the              
          existence and amount of his 1995, 1996, and 1997 Federal income             
          tax liabilities.  Under section 6330(c)(2)(B) petitioner may not            
          now, in this proceeding involving respondent’s proposed levy                
          action, dispute the amounts of his underlying Federal income                
          taxes and additions to tax for 1995, 1996, and 1997.                        







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011