Dow A. and Sandra E. Huffman, et al. - Page 26

                                         - 26 -                                       
          recalculations for all years of the member’s up until that year.            
          Those adjustments (the section 481 adjustments) are as follows:             
                         Member           1997           1998                         
                         Nissan         ---            $794,993                       
                         Volkswagen     $273,115            ---                       
                         Dodge          ---            348,762                        
                         Chrysler       ---            337,423                        
               The parties vigorously dispute whether the section 481                 
          adjustments (cumulatively, $1,709,293) are permissible, and it is           
          that question that is the primary issue before us.                          
          Change in Method of Accounting                                              
               No member of the Huffman group requested respondent’s                  
          permission to change its method of accounting.                              
                                       Discussion                                     
          I.  Introduction                                                            
               The parties are in agreement that, in computing the LIFO               
          values of the Huffman group’s yearend inventories, the accountant           
          employed by the group omitted a computational step required by              
          section 1.472-8, Income Tax Regs. (addressing the dollar-value              
          method of pricing LIFO inventories).  The consequence of the                
          accountant’s error was that, generally, he understated the LIFO             
          value of those inventories (which, generally, resulted in an under-         
          reporting of income from sales).  Respondent corrected the                  
          accountant’s error, and petitioners accept respondent’s adjustments         
          to the inventories of the members of the Huffman group for all of           
          the years in issue.  Petitioners do not accept, however,                    





Page:  Previous  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011