Robert C. and Patricia C. Humphrey - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
          C.   Collection Actions                                                     
               Respondent filed a Notice of Federal Tax Lien on July 15,              
          2002.  On July 18, 2002, respondent mailed petitioners a Notice             
          of Federal Tax Lien Filing and Your Right to a Hearing Under IRC            
          6320 (NFTL), regarding their unpaid 2000 taxes.  Petitioners                
          submitted Form 12153, Request for a Collection Due Process                  
          Hearing, to respondent indicating that they contested the filed             
          lien.  On their request, petitioners wrote only “see return                 
          amended pursuant to IRC 83(c)” as their reason for disagreeing              
          with respondent’s NFTL.                                                     
               Petitioners’ request for a hearing was assigned to an                  
          Appeals officer in Dallas, Texas.  Upon petitioners’ request, the           
          case was transferred to respondent’s Seattle, Washington, Appeals           
          Office and assigned to Denise Mountjoy.  On September 30, 2003,             
          Appeals Officer Mountjoy had a conversation with petitioners’               
          counsel, Mr. Isaacson, during which she declined to consider                
          petitioner’s request for relief because she could not consider              
          their underlying liability.  On October 8, 2003, respondent                 
          issued a Notice of Determination Concerning Collection Action(s),           
          sustaining the lien against petitioners.                                    
               Petitioner timely filed a petition for lien or levy action             
          with the Court on November 12, 2003.  On August 19, 2004, this              
          case was set for trial during the January 24, 2005, Trial Session           
          in Seattle, Washington.  On November 8, 2004, respondent moved              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011