Images in Motion of El Paso, Inc. - Page 17

                                       - 17 -                                         
          Measures of the H. Comm. on Ways and Means, 97th Cong. 97-29                
          (1981) (statement of John E. Chapoton, Assistant Secretary for              
          Tax Policy, Department of the Treasury, and Roscoe L. Egger, Jr.,           
          Commissioner of Internal Revenue stating their concern that H.R.            
          3262, 97th Cong., 1st Sess. sec. 2 (1981), did not contain a                
          requirement that the taxpayer exhaust the available                         
          administrative remedies before attorney’s fees could be awarded).           
          The record is devoid of any indication that petitioner withheld             
          relevant facts.  The examining agent’s report supports a                    
          conclusion that Ms. Lopez was forthcoming and cooperative during            
          the examination process.  Following the issuance of the 30-day              
          letter, petitioner appropriately requested that this case be                
          forwarded to the Appeals Office for review.  It is clear the                
          requirement in section 301.7430-1(b)(1), Proced. & Admin. Regs.,            
          that attendance at an Appeals Office conference is necessary to             
          exhaust administrative remedies is conditioned on the                       
          availability of the Appeals Office conference to the taxpayer.              
          Petitioner attempted to pursue an administrative appeal in the              
          hope of resolving this case because petitioner complied with the            
          30-day letter and Publication 5.  Despite petitioner’s efforts,             
          the Examination Division did not make an Appeals Office                     
          conference available to petitioner.  Cf. Haas & Associates                  
          Accountancy Corp. v. Commissioner, supra at 62.                             







Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011