- 2 - considering respondent’s motion and petitioner’s response, as supplemented, we conclude that there remain no issues of material fact that require trial or hearing. For the reasons stated below, we shall grant respondent’s motion for summary judgment and to impose a penalty pursuant to section 6673. Unless otherwise indicated, all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, and all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue. Background At the time of filing the petition in the instant case, petitioner resided in Sarasota, Florida. Petitioner failed to file a Federal income tax return or pay tax for taxable year 2002. Respondent prepared a substitute for return pursuant to section 6020(b) and, on June 8, 2004, sent petitioner a notice of deficiency showing a deficiency of $3,011.1 Petitioner failed to petition this Court, and, accordingly, respondent assessed the deficiency plus additions to tax pursuant to sections 6651(a)(1) and 6654(a) and interest. On February 19, 2005, respondent sent petitioner a Letter 1058, Final Notice of Intent to Levy and Notice of Your Right to a Hearing. On March 11, 2005, petitioner sent respondent a Form 12153, Request for a Collection Due Process Hearing, and 1Petitioner does not dispute that she received the notice of deficiency. Accordingly, this issue is deemed conceded. See Rule 331(b)(4).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011