Theodus J. Jordan - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
          made on or after the date on which the taxpayer attained age                
          59 1/2.  Sec. 72(t)(2)(A)(i).  Petitioner did not attain age                
          59 1/2 in 2002.  Petitioner has not alleged and the evidence does           
          not suggest that any other exception under section 72(t)(2)                 
          applies.6  Respondent is sustained on this issue.                           
          Alleged Credit for Offset of Petitioner’s Tax Payments                      
               Petitioner claims credit against his 2002 tax liability for            
          the $1,738 that the Treasury Department reported paying over to             
          DOE in 2002.7  Petitioner contends that this amount was paid over           
          to DOE improperly because he had no outstanding debts with DOE.             
               The Treasury Department’s payment to DOE was pursuant to               
          section 6402(d), which generally requires the Secretary, upon               
          notice from any Federal agency that a named person owes a “past-            

               6 On brief, petitioner argues for the first time that the              
          10-percent additional tax on the annuity distributions has                  
          already been paid by the “Retirement Board of the Teacher                   
          Association” upon a prior rollover of the annuity funds and that            
          respondent is now attempting “to take the same amount again.”               
          We decline to consider this issue raised for the first time on              
          brief, for to do so would result in surprise and prejudice to               
          respondent.  See Sundstrand Corp. v. Commissioner, 96 T.C. 226,             
          346-347 (1991); Seligman v. Commissioner, 84 T.C. 191, 198                  
          (1985), affd. 796 F.2d 116 (5th Cir. 1986).  In any event,                  
          petitioner’s late-raised contention is contradicted by                      
          petitioner’s own trial testimony that the “retirement board * * *           
          didn’t take out any” amount upon the prior rollover.                        
               7 On his Form 1040A, petitioner appears to have treated this           
          amount (which he listed as “$1,725 (est.)”) as an overpayment of            
          his 2001 taxes to be credited against his 2002 estimated tax.               
          Cf. sec. 301.6402-3(a)(5), Proced. & Admin. Regs. (explaining               
          procedure whereby, in lieu of receiving a refund for a particular           
          year, a taxpayer can instruct the IRS to credit his overpayment             
          against the estimated tax for the immediately succeeding year).             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011